Visit the historic Lancashire Textile Project with over 500 photos and 190 taped interviews|2|0
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Ringo
Site Administrator


3793 Posts
Posted -  25/02/2006  :  14:00
Experts have uncovered a serious security hole in the way Apple software handles downloaded files.
The flaw could give malicious attackers a back door into Mac computers if users visit carefully crafted websites and download booby-trapped files.

Although no attackers were known to be exploiting the bug, experts said it was easy to write code to take advantage of the flaw.

Separately, three concept viruses for Apple computers have been discovered.



Click for Skipton, United Kingdom Forecast
Author Replies  
Callunna
Revolving Grey Blob


3044 Posts
Posted - 07/03/2006 : 09:24
More info on the concept virus alert for Macs (from ezine TidBits):

************************* Security Update 2006-001 Validates Downloads

by Adam C. Engst <ace@tidbits.com>

Responding with reasonable alacrity to the recent Leap-A and shell script exploits, Apple released Security Update 2006-001 last week, fixing a slew of problems. Most notably, an update to Safari and LaunchServices performs additional download validation when the "Open 'safe' files after downloading" option is on to warn the user (in Mac OS X 10.4.5) or to avoid opening the download entirely (in 10.3.9). A similar update to Mail makes sure Download Validation can better detect unsafe or unknown file types in attachments. Also, an update to iChat in Mac OS X 10.4.5 now uses Download Validation to warn users of unknown or unsafe file types during file transfers.

<http://docs.info.apple.com/ article.html? artnum= 303382>

In general, increased warnings are a good thing unless they become so commonplace that users automatically agree to actions without considering the specifics. Plus, despite these changes, Apple still encourages all users to be careful about handling email attachments and opening downloaded files; see Apple's safety tips if you're not sure how to evaluate a given attachment or file. Even still, we'd like to see Apple going further to prevent the kind of deceptions that allow a malicious application to masquerade as a harmless document. Matt Neuburg's suggestion last week (see "Of Files, Forks, and FUD" in TidBITS-818) of badging all executables in some obvious way would be a step in the right direction, although deception (such as a malicious application mimicking a well-known legitimate one) remains possible.

<http://docs.info.apple.com/ article.html? artnum= 108009> <http://db.tidbits.com/ getbits.acgi? tbart= 08437>

Also important in Security Update 2006-001 is an update to apache_mod_php that includes PHP 4.4.1, a security update to the PHP scripting language. Holes in PHP - specifically in Web forms that are being exploited by spammers - are the largest security issue in the Web server world right now, and PHP 4.4.1 does not fix all of these problems. PHP is disabled by default in Mac OS X, so only people who have explicitly turned it on need worry about these concerns; see the link below for more information.

<http://www.forest.net/ support/ archives/ 2005/ 12/ 000668.php#000668>

Other updated components of Mac OS X include automount, BOM (Mac OS X's archive unpacking code), Directory Services, FileVault, IPsec, LibSystem, perl, rsync, Safari (in more ways than just increased download validation), and Syndication (Safari RSS). While some of Apple's security updates feel like fixes to issues that few people would ever encounter, a number of the problems addressed by Security Update 2006-001 are quite concerning, and we encourage everyone to install it right away. Security Update 2006-001 comes in versions for Mac OS X 10.4.5 for PowerPC (12.5 MB download) and Intel (22.5 MB), and Mac OS X 10.3.9 Client (25.3 MB) and Server (38.6 MB); all sizes are for the stand-alone version and may be somewhat different for Software Update, which provides the right version for your Mac.

<http://www.apple.com/ support/ downloads/ securityupdate2006001macosx1045ppc.html> <http://www.apple.com/ support/ downloads/ securityupdate2006001macosx1045clientintel.html> <http://www.apple.com/ support/ downloads/ securityupdate20060011039client.html> <http://www.apple.com/ support/ downloads/ securityupdate20060011039server.html>

This article refers back to: Of Files, Forks, and FUDGo to Top of Page

Stanley
Local Historian & Old Fart


36804 Posts
Posted - 07/03/2006 : 15:53
Can you imagine someone like Babbidge reading that post?  It would be totally incomprehensible to him even though he invented (but never finished) the first mechanical calculating machine, the 'Difference Engine'.  The day may be coming when Apple have to recognise that there are some nasty people out there and the only reason they have been relatively free from attacks is because the hackers had a better target.  Those days may be over.....


Stanley Challenger Graham




Barlick View
stanley at barnoldswick.freeserve.co.uk Go to Top of Page
Big Kev
Big


2650 Posts
Posted - 07/03/2006 : 15:56
I'm sure I read somewhere that the biggest threat to Mac users was from a Microsoft Word Macro. Not sure if there's any truth in it. What would you be doing running a Microsoft application on a Mac for anyway?


Big Kev

It doesn't matter who you vote for, you always end up with the government. Go to Top of Page
Callunna
Revolving Grey Blob


3044 Posts
Posted - 07/03/2006 : 16:36
Stanley - never mind owd Babbidge, do you think I ploughed through all that lot? It's totally Greek to me. I simply posted it in case some computer-literate people were interested and wanted an update on Ringo's posting. All I know is, I've downloaded my software update and hope that fixes it for the moment. It was only a 'concept' virus after all, I don't think anyone had actually created it.

Kev - I have to use Microsoft Word on my Mac as most of my clients send me their copy in a Word file. If ever my Mac falls over or freezes, you can be sure it's when Word is running.

Like I've said a trillion times - PCs are fantastic bits of kit but how come Microsoft has got away with producing such flawed products to run on them? It's a darn shame. So many more people would be able to benefit from using a computer if they weren't so unstable because of the OS and software.Go to Top of Page

Stanley
Local Historian & Old Fart


36804 Posts
Posted - 07/03/2006 : 17:01
In fairness Heather, and I am one of Windows' biggest critics in terms of their code, the modern versions of Windows are much better now.  I'm running on 2000 NT professional and it's rock solid.  Mind you, those of us who struggled through the Windows 98 days are bomb-proof when it comes to minor glytches, we've seen the lot.  My point was that Apple have never been attacked like Windows, it just wasn't worth the trouble but I suspect that now the playing field is getting levelled out in terms of security Apple computers could find they are having trouble.


Stanley Challenger Graham




Barlick View
stanley at barnoldswick.freeserve.co.uk Go to Top of Page
Callunna
Revolving Grey Blob


3044 Posts
Posted - 07/03/2006 : 18:01
I think you're absolutely right. I wasn't disputing things or arguing with anyone (for once )

XP is probably the best operating system yet (at least according to the publication I lay out every month - no personal experience of it myself, of course).

But it still sounds like hard work making sure your PC is running correctly all the time. If Gates and chums hadn't had such a monopoly I feel sure the world would be a much warmer, softer and fluffier place.

Please, all you PC users out there, I'm not having a go at you! No need to jump to the PC's defence. My beef is with Gates.Go to Top of Page

Big Kev
Big


2650 Posts
Posted - 07/03/2006 : 19:34

The PC's here at home all run XP pro, Norton Pro antivirus, two firewalls and, a free download, Lavasoft Ad-Aware and, touch wood, they've been as good as gold.

 




Big Kev

It doesn't matter who you vote for, you always end up with the government. Go to Top of Page
Stanley
Local Historian & Old Fart


36804 Posts
Posted - 08/03/2006 : 08:24
XP pro 64 bit is getting there.  Word is that there is another major revision coming out this year.  At long last they are getting there.  As usual, I shall plod on with 2000NT until I am absolutely sure there is something better on the cards.


Stanley Challenger Graham




Barlick View
stanley at barnoldswick.freeserve.co.uk Go to Top of Page
Ringo
Site Administrator


3793 Posts
Posted - 08/03/2006 : 08:40
Microsoft is planning six versions of the next incarnation of its Windows operating system.

Three versions of the software, called Vista, will be for home users, two will be for businesses and one will be for emerging markets.

One of the home versions of Vista will include features that let users store and play back TV shows.

No fixed date has been given for the release of Vista but it is expected to be launched by the end of 2006.



Click for Skipton, United Kingdom Forecast
Go to Top of Page
Ringo
Site Administrator


3793 Posts
Posted - 17/03/2006 : 20:36
Hackers have managed to get Microsoft's Windows XP operating system running on an Apple Mac computer.
The success ends a competition started to see if the feat was even possible when Apple unveiled computers that used Intel chips.

The pair who managed the feat won $13,854 (£7,895) in prize money for their trouble.

The software used to put Windows on the Mac is now being circulated so others can try to replicate the success



Click for Skipton, United Kingdom Forecast
Go to Top of Page
Ringo
Site Administrator


3793 Posts
Posted - 05/04/2006 : 22:42
Apple has released software that lets users run Microsoft's operating system on its computers that use Intel chips.
Called Boot Camp the program lets Mac owners run both Apple's OSX and Microsoft's Windows XP.

A trial version of the software is now available so users can install it. Future versions of Apple's OSX software will include the program.

The release follows efforts by hackers to get Windows XP booting up on Macs that use Intel chips.



Click for Skipton, United Kingdom Forecast
Go to Top of Page
Stanley
Local Historian & Old Fart


36804 Posts
Posted - 06/04/2006 : 05:50
It also means that Apple will sell more computers as the techno geeks rush to get the latest 'advantages'.  Poor people like H will carry on with their creaking old computers cheerfully earning a living and employing Doc to do the heavy work........


Stanley Challenger Graham




Barlick View
stanley at barnoldswick.freeserve.co.uk Go to Top of Page


Set us as your default homepage Bookmark us Privacy   Copyright © 2004-2011 www.oneguyfrombarlick.co.uk All Rights Reserved. Design by: Frost SkyPortal.net Go To Top Of Page

Page load time - 0.485